| Item | Market | STRANOVA | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | Notre Dame -5.5 to -6.5 | Notre Dame 0.8 model of record, Miami 0.4 opponent adjusted scoring view, Notre Dame 3.5 with the home and road split | The market is about five points higher on Notre Dame |
| Moneyline and win chance | Notre Dame about -205 to -210, Miami +170 to +175 | 51% Notre Dame model of record, 56% with the home and road split | The market is well above us on the Irish |
| Total | 57.5 | 65 (Notre Dame 33, Miami 32) | Low confidence, no lean |
Market is the posted range reported by outlets Nov. 2 to 4, 2026, before the Wednesday news on Miami receiver Malachi Toney. Lines move, so re-check Saturday morning. STRANOVA does not adjust for injuries. Our total projection has not beaten a simple average in testing, so we show it without a lean. Not wagering advice.
| Notre Dame | Miami | |
|---|---|---|
| STRANOVA ratingOne number per team from every game this season, adjusted for opponent and home field. Rank is among 138 FBS teams. | 15.6 7th | 16.7 5th |
| Points for / against per gameRaw averages, not adjusted. | 40.4 / 13.4 | 47.6 / 17.8 |
| Yards per play, offense / defenseRaw. | 6.60 / 4.31 | 7.72 / 5.11 |
| Rush yards per designed carry, offense / defenseSack yardage is taken out of the rushing numbers and put with passing. Raw. | 5.20 / 3.44 | 5.89 / 3.40 |
| Net pass yards per dropback, offense / defensePassing yards minus sack losses, divided by attempts plus sacks. Raw. | 8.21 / 5.26 | 9.67 / 6.13 |
| Turnovers lost / forced | 2 / 16 | 3 / 10 |
| Sacks taken / madeSacks taken by the offense (yards lost) and sacks made by the defense. | 2 (9 yds) / 15 | 10 (58 yds) / 24 |
| Red zone touchdown rate, offense / defense allowedCFBStats, through Nov. 3. Rank among 138. | 67% 42nd / 61% 80th | 81% 4th / 53% 40th |
| Third down conversion, offense / defense allowedRank among 138. | 43% 43rd / 38% 71st | 55% 2nd / 38% 65th |
| Average opponent ratingAverage STRANOVA rating of the FBS teams each has played. Higher means a tougher schedule. | 0.7 | 2.3 |
| Record, losses | 7-1 (at BYU) | 8-0 |
Miami owns the better scoring offense, run game and pass offense. Notre Dame owns the better scoring defense and pass defense. The run defenses are a one rank toss up (Miami 4th, Notre Dame 5th). The longer bar is the better rank.
How to read the ranks: we estimate every FBS team's scoring, rushing and passing strength from all of this season's games at once. A team that faced strong defenses is not penalized for it. Ranks are STRANOVA estimates, not raw national rankings.
Neutral field numbers come from the opponent adjusted estimates alone. The projected score on the cover splits the projected total using the model of record margin (Notre Dame by 0.8). The scoring layer by itself, with a home field credit added, reads Miami by 0.4. Both views say coin flip.
The schedules are close. Miami's FBS opponents' scoring offenses average 68th and their scoring defenses 59th. Notre Dame's average 74th and 70th. Miami has one FCS game (Florida A&M) and Notre Dame none. The two common opponents are Stanford and North Carolina: Notre Dame beat Stanford by 51 at home and North Carolina by 11 on the road, Miami beat Stanford by 39 and North Carolina by 3, both on the road.
| Date | Opponent | Site | Score | Margin | Opponent OFFENSE rank | Opponent DEFENSE rank | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pts | Rush | Pass | Pts | Rush | Pass | |||||
| 9/6 | Wisconsin | Neutral | 41-13 | W +28 | 71 | 77 | 78 | 12 | 7 | 21 |
| 9/12 | Rice | Home | 52-0 | W +52 | 117 | 19 | 129 | 118 | 111 | 82 |
| 9/19 | Michigan State | Home | 27-10 | W +17 | 93 | 110 | 107 | 48 | 48 | 79 |
| 9/26 | Purdue | Road | 49-10 | W +39 | 29 | 104 | 27 | 105 | 98 | 115 |
| 10/3 | North Carolina | Road | 37-26 | W +11 | 58 | 66 | 37 | 37 | 60 | 39 |
| 10/10 | Stanford | Home | 58-7 | W +51 | 104 | 103 | 79 | 126 | 120 | 97 |
| 10/17 | BYU | Road | 24-28 | L −4 | 40 | 54 | 21 | 15 | 30 | 5 |
| 10/31 | Navy | Neutral | 35-13 | W +22 | 80 | 32 | 6 | 97 | 62 | 136 |
| Average opponent rank (FBS only) | 74 | 71 | 60 | 70 | 67 | 72 | ||||
| 11/7 | Miami | Road | Sat | Next | 1 | 17 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 61 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Score | Margin | Opponent OFFENSE rank | Opponent DEFENSE rank | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pts | Rush | Pass | Pts | Rush | Pass | |||||
| 9/4 | Stanford | Road | 45-6 | W +39 | 104 | 103 | 79 | 126 | 120 | 97 |
| 9/10 | Florida A&M | Home | 77-7 | W +70 | FCS, not ranked | |||||
| 9/18 | Wake Forest | Road | 33-20 | W +13 | 14 | 76 | 10 | 13 | 9 | 11 |
| 9/26 | Central Michigan | Home | 52-3 | W +49 | 126 | 79 | 137 | 91 | 107 | 54 |
| 10/3 | Clemson | Road | 41-13 | W +28 | 87 | 80 | 128 | 33 | 55 | 13 |
| 10/17 | Florida State | Home | 43-35 | W +8 | 38 | 20 | 22 | 81 | 104 | 78 |
| 10/24 | Pittsburgh | Home | 52-23 | W +29 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 29 | 1 | 63 |
| 10/31 | North Carolina | Road | 38-35 | W +3 | 58 | 66 | 37 | 37 | 60 | 39 |
| Average opponent rank (FBS only) | 68 | 68 | 66 | 59 | 65 | 51 | ||||
| 11/7 | Notre Dame | Home | Sat | Next | 5 | 44 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
Rank cells shade from bright blue (top 10, the toughest opponents) to dim gray (outside the top 100). Blue only means a strong opponent. The bold bottom row of each table is Saturday's opponent. Florida A&M is FCS and left out of averages.
For every game: what the team scored or allowed, compared with what that opponent normally gives up or produces.
| Date | Opponent | Site | OFFENSE vs opponent norm | DEFENSE vs opponent norm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rush yds per carry | Pass net yds per dropback | Points | Rush yds per carry | Pass net yds per dropback | |||
| 9/6 | Wisconsin | Neutral | +27.3 | +0.48 | +2.62 | +12.1 | +2.03 | −0.15 |
| 9/12 | Rice | Home | +23.1 | −1.63 | +5.47 | +24.0 | +4.17 | +0.76 |
| 9/19 | Michigan State | Home | +1.4 | −0.96 | +2.80 | +11.3 | +0.65 | +1.40 |
| 9/26 | Purdue | Road | +19.3 | +0.44 | +2.75 | +22.3 | +0.73 | +4.73 |
| 10/3 | North Carolina | Road | +16.0 | +0.96 | +2.23 | −0.3 | +0.68 | −0.05 |
| 10/10 | Stanford | Home | +23.2 | +2.07 | +1.40 | +15.0 | +1.44 | +0.52 |
| 10/17 | BYU | Road | +6.0 | −0.26 | +0.64 | +5.0 | +1.06 | +1.90 |
| 10/31 | Navy | Neutral | +5.9 | +3.03 | −0.99 | +16.7 | +1.50 | +6.00 |
| Average vs FBS opponents | +15.3 | +0.52 | +2.12 | +13.3 | +1.53 | +1.89 | ||
| Date | Opponent | Site | OFFENSE vs opponent norm | DEFENSE vs opponent norm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rush yds per carry | Pass net yds per dropback | Points | Rush yds per carry | Pass net yds per dropback | |||
| 9/4 | Stanford | Road | +8.6 | −2.31 | +5.29 | +16.1 | +0.57 | +1.53 |
| 9/10 | Florida A&M | Home | FCS, no opponent norm | |||||
| 9/18 | Wake Forest | Road | +17.3 | +1.49 | +1.10 | +21.9 | +2.16 | +3.48 |
| 9/26 | Central Michigan | Home | +29.9 | +1.74 | +4.59 | +17.0 | +3.44 | +0.49 |
| 10/3 | Clemson | Road | +22.1 | +2.00 | +2.65 | +11.7 | +1.18 | −0.55 |
| 10/17 | Florida State | Home | +16.1 | +0.77 | +2.62 | −5.0 | +0.95 | −1.83 |
| 10/24 | Pittsburgh | Home | +36.2 | +1.25 | +2.82 | +10.0 | +1.47 | −1.58 |
| 10/31 | North Carolina | Road | +17.1 | −0.05 | +3.41 | −10.6 | +1.17 | −1.68 |
| Average vs FBS opponents | +21.1 | +0.70 | +3.21 | +8.7 | +1.56 | −0.02 | ||
Offense columns: positive means the team scored or gained more than that opponent normally allows. Defense columns: positive means the team held the opponent below what it normally produces. The norm excludes the game being measured. Opponent norms for 136 other teams rest on one data source (ESPN box scores).
Saturday is Notre Dame at home and Miami on the road. Here is what each team has done in exactly that spot, against FBS opponents only.
| Site | FBS games | OFFENSE vs norm | DEFENSE vs norm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rush | Pass | Points | Rush | Pass | ||
| Home | 3 | +15.9 | −0.17 | +3.22 | +16.8 | +2.09 | +0.89 |
| Road | 3 | +13.8 | +0.38 | +1.87 | +9.0 | +0.82 | +2.19 |
| Neutral | 2 | +16.6 | +1.76 | +0.81 | +14.4 | +1.76 | +2.93 |
| Season | 8 | +15.3 | +0.52 | +2.12 | +13.3 | +1.53 | +1.89 |
| Site | FBS games | OFFENSE vs norm | DEFENSE vs norm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rush | Pass | Points | Rush | Pass | ||
| Home | 3 | +27.4 | +1.25 | +3.34 | +7.3 | +1.95 | −0.97 |
| Road | 4 | +16.3 | +0.28 | +3.11 | +9.8 | +1.27 | +0.69 |
| Season | 7 | +21.1 | +0.70 | +3.21 | +8.7 | +1.56 | −0.02 |
| Scenario | Weight on site games | Notre Dame offense shift | Notre Dame defense shift | Miami offense shift | Miami defense shift | Notre Dame margin | Notre Dame win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model of record | n/a | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 51.4% |
| Conservative | n/(n+6) | −0.0 | +0.9 | −1.6 | +0.7 | 2.6 | 54.6% |
| Central | n/(n+3) | −0.0 | +1.4 | −2.4 | +1.0 | 3.5 | 56.1% |
| Aggressive | n/(n+1) | −0.1 | +2.1 | −3.3 | +1.4 | 4.7 | 58.2% |
Method: each unit's home or road average, after taking out the normal home field effect, is blended toward its season average. More games means more weight. Positive shifts help the team. Scenarios are illustrative, not a new model version. The model of record is unchanged.
Ball security and third down, game by game. Net is turnovers forced minus turnovers lost, so green is a good night.
| Date | Opponent | Site | Lost | Forced | Net | Own third downs | Opponent third downs | Points per 100 yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/6 | Wisconsin | Neutral | 0 | 2 | +2 | 3 of 9 | 5 of 13 | 11.7 |
| 9/12 | Rice | Home | 0 | 4 | +4 | 7 of 12 | 2 of 12 | 10.9 |
| 9/19 | Michigan State | Home | 0 | 2 | +2 | 4 of 12 | 4 of 11 | 6.8 |
| 9/26 | Purdue | Road | 1 | 1 | +0 | 3 of 8 | 8 of 18 | 11.0 |
| 10/3 | North Carolina | Road | 0 | 2 | +2 | 4 of 11 | 5 of 10 | 7.8 |
| 10/10 | Stanford | Home | 0 | 3 | +3 | 8 of 13 | 2 of 11 | 9.7 |
| 10/17 | BYU | Road | 1 | 2 | +1 | 8 of 19 | 8 of 12 | 6.4 |
| 10/31 | Navy | Neutral | 0 | 0 | +0 | 3 of 8 | 4 of 12 | 8.2 |
| Home | 3 games | 0 | 9 | +9 | 19 of 37 (51%) | 8 of 34 (24%) | ||
| Road | 3 games | 2 | 5 | +3 | 15 of 38 (39%) | 21 of 40 (52%) | ||
| Neutral | 2 games | 0 | 2 | +2 | 6 of 17 (35%) | 9 of 25 (36%) | ||
| Season | 8 games | 2 | 16 | +14 | 40 of 92 (43%) | 38 of 99 (38%) |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Lost | Forced | Net | Own third downs | Opponent third downs | Points per 100 yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/4 | Stanford | Road | 1 | 0 | −1 | 8 of 11 | 5 of 15 | 8.2 |
| 9/10 | Florida A&M | Home | 1 | 0 | −1 | 1 of 3 | 1 of 14 | 9.0 |
| 9/18 | Wake Forest | Road | 0 | 1 | +1 | 5 of 13 | 4 of 12 | 8.7 |
| 9/26 | Central Michigan | Home | 0 | 3 | +3 | 6 of 9 | 6 of 14 | 9.1 |
| 10/3 | Clemson | Road | 0 | 2 | +2 | 4 of 11 | 8 of 18 | 9.8 |
| 10/17 | Florida State | Home | 1 | 2 | +1 | 8 of 15 | 5 of 12 | 7.4 |
| 10/24 | Pittsburgh | Home | 0 | 1 | +1 | 10 of 15 | 4 of 12 | 10.3 |
| 10/31 | North Carolina | Road | 0 | 1 | +1 | 6 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 9.1 |
| Home | 4 games | 2 | 6 | +4 | 25 of 42 (60%) | 16 of 52 (31%) | ||
| Road | 4 games | 1 | 4 | +3 | 23 of 46 (50%) | 25 of 56 (45%) | ||
| Season | 8 games | 3 | 10 | +7 | 48 of 88 (55%) | 41 of 108 (38%) |
Source: ESPN box scores. Points per 100 yards is points scored divided by total yards. Third down counts come from the game rows (Notre Dame 40 of 92, Miami 48 of 88 for the season).
For each team, the three past opponents whose offense and defense profile looks most like Saturday's opponent. These games are the closest thing to a rehearsal.
| Opponent | Site | Score | Margin | Profile gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYU | Road | L 24-28 | −4 | 31.7 |
| North Carolina | Road | W 37-26 | +11 | 38.3 |
| Wisconsin | Neutral | W 41-13 | +28 | 44.2 |
Average margin +11.7, record 2-1.
| Opponent | Site | Score | Margin | Profile gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest | Road | W 33-20 | +13 | 9.7 |
| Pittsburgh | Home | W 52-23 | +29 | 28.2 |
| North Carolina | Road | W 38-35 | +3 | 35.3 |
Average margin +15.0, record 3-0.
Treat this as a sanity check, not a forecast. Three games per team, with profile gaps of 10 to 44 (lower means a closer match, and these are loose matches for two teams this good), and different injuries in several of them.
Yards and possession do not decide games. What a team does once it reaches the 20 does, and so do third and fourth down. Notre Dame's defense is the clearest case in this matchup. It forces turnovers and sacks, then gives up points on 16 of the 18 red zone trips it has faced. Miami's offense is the best red zone finisher in the group, with a touchdown on 34 of 42 trips.
| Notre Dame | Miami | |
|---|---|---|
| Red zone trips per game, offense | 4.5 | 5.2 |
| Touchdown rate, offenseShare of red zone trips that end in a touchdown. Rank among 138. | 67% 42nd | 81% 4th |
| Scoring rate, offenseShare of trips that end in any points. | 86% 58th | 93% 16th |
| Empty trips, offenseTrips with no points: turnover, downs, missed kick, clock. | 5 of 36 | 3 of 42 |
| Red zone trips allowed per game, defense | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Touchdown rate allowed, defenseRank among 138, 1 is stingiest. | 61% 80th | 53% 40th |
| Scoring rate allowed, defenseShare of opponent trips that end in any points. | 89% 106th | 68% 4th |
| Third down conversion, offense / defenseRank among 138 for each. | 43% 43rd / 38% 71st | 55% 2nd / 38% 65th |
| Fourth down, offense / defenseConversions of attempts. Small samples. | 14 of 19 10th / 7 of 11 allowed 108th | 4 of 9 102nd / 4 of 15 allowed 4th |
Red zone, third and fourth down season figures are from CFBStats (NCAA official definition: a trip is a snap at or inside the opponent 20), through games of Nov. 3. Ranks are among 138 and were checked against CFBStats' own rank for scoring rate. Game by game lines below are built from ESPN drive data with the same snap rule and agree with CFBStats within one to two trips (Miami offense 44 trips and 33 touchdowns built against 42 and 34 official, Miami defense 11 touchdowns against 10, Notre Dame defense 19 trips against 18). Third and fourth down match exactly. Points per trip assume 7 for a touchdown and 3 for a field goal.
| Opponent | Site | Trips | How they ended | Points per trip | Third down | Fourth down |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin | Neutral | 4 | 3 TD, 1 FG, 0 empty | 6.00 | 3 of 9 | 1 of 1 |
| Rice | Home | 6 | 4 TD, 1 FG, 1 empty | 5.17 | 7 of 12 | 1 of 2 |
| Michigan State | Home | 5 | 3 TD, 2 FG, 0 empty | 5.40 | 4 of 12 | 2 of 3 |
| Purdue | Road | 4 | 4 TD, 0 FG, 0 empty | 7.00 | 3 of 8 | 1 of 1 |
| North Carolina | Road | 5 | 3 TD, 1 FG, 1 empty | 4.80 | 4 of 11 | 3 of 5 |
| Stanford | Home | 4 | 3 TD, 1 FG, 0 empty | 6.00 | 8 of 13 | none |
| BYU | Road | 5 | 2 TD, 1 FG, 2 empty | 3.40 | 8 of 19 | 4 of 4 |
| Navy | Neutral | 3 | 2 TD, 0 FG, 1 empty | 4.67 | 3 of 8 | 2 of 3 |
| Opponent | Site | Trips allowed | How they ended | Points per trip allowed | Third down allowed | Fourth down allowed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin | Neutral | 3 | 0 TD, 2 FG, 1 empty | 2.00 | 5 of 13 | 1 of 1 |
| Rice | Home | 1 | 0 TD, 0 FG, 1 empty | 0.00 | 2 of 12 | 2 of 2 |
| Michigan State | Home | 2 | 1 TD, 1 FG, 0 empty | 5.00 | 4 of 11 | 1 of 1 |
| Purdue | Road | 2 | 1 TD, 0 FG, 1 empty | 3.50 | 8 of 18 | 0 of 2 |
| North Carolina | Road | 3 | 3 TD, 0 FG, 0 empty | 7.00 | 5 of 10 | 1 of 1 |
| Stanford | Home | 1 | 1 TD, 0 FG, 0 empty | 7.00 | 2 of 11 | none |
| BYU | Road | 4 | 4 TD, 0 FG, 0 empty | 7.00 | 8 of 12 | 0 of 1 |
| Navy | Neutral | 3 | 1 TD, 2 FG, 0 empty | 4.33 | 4 of 12 | 2 of 3 |
| Opponent | Site | Trips | How they ended | Points per trip | Third down | Fourth down |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford | Road | 3 | 3 TD, 0 FG, 0 empty | 7.00 | 8 of 11 | none |
| Florida A&M FCS | Home | 7 | 5 TD, 0 FG, 2 empty | 5.00 | 1 of 3 | 0 of 1 |
| Wake Forest | Road | 5 | 3 TD, 1 FG, 1 empty | 4.80 | 5 of 13 | none |
| Central Michigan | Home | 7 | 5 TD, 1 FG, 1 empty | 5.43 | 6 of 9 | 1 of 1 |
| Clemson | Road | 3 | 2 TD, 1 FG, 0 empty | 5.67 | 4 of 11 | 1 of 2 |
| Florida State | Home | 6 | 5 TD, 0 FG, 1 empty | 5.83 | 8 of 15 | 0 of 2 |
| Pittsburgh | Home | 8 | 6 TD, 1 FG, 1 empty | 5.62 | 10 of 15 | 0 of 1 |
| North Carolina | Road | 5 | 4 TD, 1 FG, 0 empty | 6.20 | 6 of 11 | 2 of 2 |
| Opponent | Site | Trips allowed | How they ended | Points per trip allowed | Third down allowed | Fourth down allowed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford | Road | 2 | 0 TD, 2 FG, 0 empty | 3.00 | 5 of 15 | 0 of 2 |
| Florida A&M FCS | Home | 0 | no trips | n/a | 1 of 14 | none |
| Wake Forest | Road | 3 | 2 TD, 0 FG, 1 empty | 4.67 | 4 of 12 | 1 of 3 |
| Central Michigan | Home | 0 | no trips | n/a | 6 of 14 | none |
| Clemson | Road | 3 | 1 TD, 1 FG, 1 empty | 3.33 | 8 of 18 | 1 of 3 |
| Florida State | Home | 4 | 2 TD, 0 FG, 2 empty | 3.50 | 5 of 12 | 0 of 3 |
| Pittsburgh | Home | 2 | 1 TD, 0 FG, 1 empty | 3.50 | 4 of 12 | 0 of 2 |
| North Carolina | Road | 5 | 5 TD, 0 FG, 0 empty | 7.00 | 8 of 11 | 2 of 2 |
| Notre Dame | Miami | |
|---|---|---|
| Expected red zone tripsAverage of what the offense gets per game and what the opposing defense allows per game. | 3.4 | 3.8 |
| Expected points per tripAverage of the offense's points per trip and the opposing defense's points per trip allowed. | 4.70 | 5.57 |
| Expected red zone points | 16.2 | 20.9 |
The model of record (Notre Dame by 0.8) already contains every point these teams scored, so the red zone layer does not change the number. What it adds is where the number is fragile. Miami gets about 3.8 trips to Notre Dame's 3.4 in this blend, and Miami finishes them better. Third down tilts Miami's way too (54.5% against a Notre Dame defense that allows 38.4%). Fourth down is the Irish edge: Notre Dame converts 14 of 19 (10th) and Miami's defense has allowed only 4 of 15 (4th), so a short fourth down in Miami territory is the one decision that can swing a half. Red zone and third down rates are being tested as inputs for STRANOVA v0.5 in the walk forward. They are not in the v0.4 rating.
Miami is not required to file an ACC availability report for this non conference game. This is what is reported as of Wednesday night, Nov. 4.
| If Toney is out, Miami loses this many expected points | Notre Dame margin | Notre Dame win probability | Change from model of record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (model of record, healthy) | Notre Dame 0.8 | 51.4% | 0.0 pts |
| 2 | Notre Dame 2.8 | 54.9% | +3.5 pts |
| 3 | Notre Dame 3.8 | 56.6% | +5.2 pts |
| 5 | Notre Dame 5.8 | 60.0% | +8.7 pts |
Scenario table, not a model output. STRANOVA does not adjust for injuries, and the point costs (2, 3 and 5) are illustrative guesses until there is data on how Miami's offense performs without him. Miami has scored 33 or more in all 8 games and has depth at receiver, so targets would be redistributed. The market line of Notre Dame 5.5 to 6.5 was reported before the Toney news and is likely to move if he is ruled out.
The handful of numbers that decide this game, each one checkable at halftime.
| Threshold | What the season says | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Keep Miami under 55% on third down | Miami converted 55% or better in 4 of 8 games (Stanford, Central Michigan, Pittsburgh, North Carolina). Notre Dame's defense ranks 71st on third down. | Live |
| Win the turnover battle | Notre Dame has a 16 to 2 edge on the season. Miami has lost only 3 turnovers, so the margin has to come from Miami's habits, not luck. | Hard |
| Finish drives | Notre Dame scores a touchdown on 66.7% of red zone trips (42nd). Miami's defense allows 52.6% (40th). | Live |
| Pressure Mensah | Notre Dame's defense has 15 sacks in 8 games. Miami's offense has taken 10. | Likely |
| Threshold | What the season says | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Throw against the 12th ranked pass defense | Miami ranks first in adjusted pass offense and Notre Dame 12th in pass defense. This is the game inside the game, and Toney's status sits on top of it. | Live |
| Run against the 5th ranked run defense | Miami ranks 17th in rushing and Notre Dame 5th against the run. Notre Dame's offense is 44th in rushing, so the Irish need Carr to win through the air. | Likely |
| Convert third downs near 55% | Miami converts 54.5% (2nd). Notre Dame's defense allows 38.4% (71st). | Likely |
| Hold the line against the pass | Miami ranks 61st in adjusted pass defense, its softest unit. Notre Dame's offense ranks 14th in passing. | Live |
STRANOVA rates every team from every game it has played. Each result is credited by margin with diminishing returns, so a blowout counts for little more than a comfortable win. Home field is credited. Ratings start from conference averages, so a team that has played a weak schedule is not overrated.
Tested on games it had not seen. Walk-forward on 314 FBS vs FBS games in weeks 4 to 9: 67.8% winner accuracy against 58.3% for picking the home team and 64.6% for picking the better record.
Projections are statistical estimates for information and entertainment, not wagering advice. Data: ESPN public game feeds through Nov. 1, 2026 and CFBStats through Nov. 3 (both pulled Nov. 4). Market, schedule and injury context from the sources listed below.
ESPN public game and box score feeds; CFBStats (red zone, third and fourth down, season totals); ESPN (Pete Thamel and Max Olson, Nov. 4) on Malachi Toney; On3 (injury report vs. Miami, Toney); Bleacher Report (Toney, Notre Dame injuries); Yahoo Sports (Toney averages, rankings); CanesWarning; Local10 and Wikipedia (Miami game dates); AP Top 25 (Nov. 1) and the first CFP ranking (Nov. 3); betting lines as reported by outlets Nov. 2 to 4.