STRANOVA rates every FBS team from every game it has played and projects Saturday's Holy War. Completely free. No cost. No sign up required.
| Item | Market | STRANOVA | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | Utah -5.5 | Utah 10.7 model of record, 6.8 opponent adjusted scoring view, 16.4 with the home and road split | We are higher on Utah than the market |
| Moneyline and win chance | About -200 / +170, roughly 64% to 66% Utah after removing the sportsbook margin | 68% model of record, 76% with the home and road split | We are a little above the market |
| Total | 47.5 to 48.5 | 51 (29 to 22) | Low confidence, no lean |
Market is the posted line Nov. 2 to 4, 2026 (two sportsbooks agree on Utah -5.5). Lines move, so re-check Saturday morning. Our total projection has not beaten a simple average in testing, so we show it without a lean. Not wagering advice.
| Utah | BYU | |
|---|---|---|
| STRANOVA ratingOne number per team from every game this season, adjusted for opponent and home field. Higher is better. Rank is among 138 FBS teams. | 14.6 9th | 10.0 19th |
| Points for / against per gameRaw averages, not adjusted. | 38.9 / 15.9 | 32.4 / 18.8 |
| Yards per play, offense / defenseGained by the offense / allowed by the defense. Raw. | 6.90 / 5.23 | 6.37 / 4.49 |
| Rush yards per designed carry, offense / defenseSack yardage is taken out of the rushing numbers and put with passing. Raw. | 6.09 / 4.39 | 5.16 / 4.10 |
| Net pass yards per dropback, offense / defensePassing yards minus sack losses, divided by pass attempts plus sacks. Raw. | 7.86 / 5.83 | 7.86 / 4.78 |
| Turnovers lost / forced | 10 / 12 | 8 / 9 |
| Sacks taken / madeSacks taken by the offense (yards lost) and sacks made by the defense. | 10 (49 yds) / 16 | 5 (27 yds) / 18 |
| Average opponent ratingThe average STRANOVA rating of the 7 FBS teams each has played. Higher means a tougher schedule. | 2.3 | 3.8 |
| Record, losses | 8-0 | 7-1 (at UCF) |
Utah owns the better scoring offense and the better run game. BYU owns the better pass offense, pass defense and run defense. Scoring defense is a one-rank toss-up (BYU 15th, Utah 16th). The longer bar is the better rank.
How to read the ranks: we estimate every FBS team's scoring, rushing and passing strength from all of this season's games at once. A team that faced strong defenses is not penalized for it. Ranks are STRANOVA estimates, not raw national rankings.
Neutral field numbers come from the opponent adjusted scoring, rushing and passing estimates alone. The projected score on the cover adds a home field credit to Utah and takes it from BYU.
BYU has played the tougher schedule on offense: its FBS opponents' scoring offenses average 44th against 69th for Utah's. Scoring defenses are nearly even, 56th for BYU's opponents and 59th for Utah's. Both teams played one FCS opponent and one common opponent, Iowa State.
| Date | Opponent | Site | Score | Margin | Opponent OFFENSE rank | Opponent DEFENSE rank | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pts | Rush | Pass | Pts | Rush | Pass | |||||
| 9/3 | Idaho | Home | 66-14 | W +52 | FCS, not ranked | |||||
| 9/12 | Arkansas | Home | 43-10 | W +33 | 94 | 123 | 83 | 71 | 73 | 109 |
| 9/19 | Utah State | Home | 33-0 | W +33 | 133 | 101 | 121 | 35 | 42 | 35 |
| 9/26 | Iowa State | Road | 31-17 | W +14 | 57 | 40 | 60 | 65 | 91 | 75 |
| 10/10 | Kansas | Home | 41-24 | W +17 | 49 | 68 | 30 | 55 | 61 | 48 |
| 10/17 | Colorado | Road | 27-24 | W +3 | 103 | 97 | 53 | 70 | 16 | 59 |
| 10/24 | Houston | Home | 21-13 | W +8 | 19 | 35 | 12 | 21 | 33 | 92 |
| 10/31 | Cincinnati | Road | 49-25 | W +24 | 27 | 2 | 40 | 94 | 81 | 105 |
| Average opponent rank (FBS only) | 69 | 67 | 57 | 59 | 57 | 75 | ||||
| 11/7 | BYU | Home | Sat | Next | 40 | 54 | 21 | 15 | 30 | 5 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Score | Margin | Opponent OFFENSE rank | Opponent DEFENSE rank | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pts | Rush | Pass | Pts | Rush | Pass | |||||
| 9/5 | Utah Tech | Home | 63-7 | W +56 | FCS, not ranked | |||||
| 9/12 | Arizona | Home | 28-17 | W +11 | 28 | 93 | 20 | 28 | 23 | 25 |
| 9/19 | Colorado State | Road | 41-23 | W +18 | 25 | 36 | 54 | 138 | 138 | 138 |
| 10/3 | TCU | Road | 17-10 | W +7 | 98 | 117 | 59 | 2 | 17 | 7 |
| 10/9 | Iowa State | Home | 24-10 | W +14 | 57 | 40 | 60 | 65 | 91 | 75 |
| 10/17 | Notre Dame | Home | 28-24 | W +4 | 5 | 44 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 10/24 | UCF | Road | 31-39 | L −8 | 44 | 45 | 84 | 49 | 13 | 76 |
| 10/31 | Arizona State | Home | 27-20 | W +7 | 54 | 31 | 90 | 103 | 67 | 42 |
| Average opponent rank (FBS only) | 44 | 58 | 54 | 56 | 51 | 54 | ||||
| 11/7 | Utah | Road | Sat | Next | 10 | 7 | 23 | 16 | 46 | 41 |
Rank cells shade from bright blue (top 10, the toughest opponents) to dim gray (outside the top 100). Blue only means a strong opponent. The bold bottom row of each table is Saturday's opponent. Idaho (Utah) and Utah Tech (BYU) are FCS and left out of averages.
For every game: what the team scored or allowed, compared with what that opponent normally gives up or produces.
| Date | Opponent | Site | OFFENSE vs opponent norm | DEFENSE vs opponent norm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rush yds per carry | Pass net yds per dropback | Points | Rush yds per carry | Pass net yds per dropback | |||
| 9/3 | Idaho | Home | FCS, no opponent norm | |||||
| 9/12 | Arkansas | Home | +17.6 | −0.46 | +3.36 | +11.0 | −0.02 | +2.01 |
| 9/19 | Utah State | Home | +12.7 | +1.26 | +2.10 | +19.3 | +0.83 | +2.90 |
| 9/26 | Iowa State | Road | +4.3 | +1.60 | +0.23 | +13.7 | +1.66 | +2.41 |
| 10/10 | Kansas | Home | +19.7 | +2.62 | +1.35 | +5.9 | +2.32 | −1.62 |
| 10/17 | Colorado | Road | −2.7 | −0.39 | −0.77 | −3.4 | −1.43 | −1.51 |
| 10/24 | Houston | Home | +0.0 | +2.75 | +0.50 | +26.3 | +1.60 | +2.04 |
| 10/31 | Cincinnati | Road | +22.6 | +1.46 | +1.53 | +10.4 | −1.04 | +0.11 |
| Average vs FBS opponents | +10.6 | +1.26 | +1.19 | +11.9 | +0.56 | +0.90 | ||
| Date | Opponent | Site | OFFENSE vs opponent norm | DEFENSE vs opponent norm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rush yds per carry | Pass net yds per dropback | Points | Rush yds per carry | Pass net yds per dropback | |||
| 9/5 | Utah Tech | Home | FCS, no opponent norm | |||||
| 9/12 | Arizona | Home | +10.4 | +1.41 | +2.45 | +20.4 | +0.68 | +2.39 |
| 9/19 | Colorado State | Road | −1.6 | +1.70 | +3.98 | +14.3 | +2.37 | +2.23 |
| 10/3 | TCU | Road | +3.3 | +0.59 | −3.44 | +15.1 | +0.37 | +1.96 |
| 10/9 | Iowa State | Home | −3.7 | +0.77 | +4.40 | +21.7 | −0.08 | +5.25 |
| 10/17 | Notre Dame | Home | +16.7 | +0.75 | +1.53 | +18.7 | +1.45 | +3.59 |
| 10/24 | UCF | Road | +6.6 | −0.47 | +0.60 | −10.6 | +0.65 | −0.80 |
| 10/31 | Arizona State | Home | −2.9 | −3.44 | +2.01 | +10.9 | −0.01 | +3.76 |
| Average vs FBS opponents | +4.1 | +0.19 | +1.65 | +12.9 | +0.78 | +2.63 | ||
Offense columns: positive means the team scored or gained more than that opponent normally allows. Defense columns: positive means the team held the opponent below what it normally produces. The norm excludes the game being measured. Opponent norms for 136 other teams rest on one data source (ESPN box scores).
Saturday is Utah at home and BYU on the road. Here is what each team has done in exactly that spot, against FBS opponents only.
| Site | FBS games | OFFENSE vs norm | DEFENSE vs norm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rush | Pass | Points | Rush | Pass | ||
| Home | 4 | +12.5 | +1.54 | +1.83 | +15.6 | +1.18 | +1.33 |
| Road | 3 | +8.0 | +0.89 | +0.33 | +6.9 | −0.27 | +0.34 |
| Season | 7 | +10.6 | +1.26 | +1.19 | +11.9 | +0.56 | +0.90 |
| Site | FBS games | OFFENSE vs norm | DEFENSE vs norm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rush | Pass | Points | Rush | Pass | ||
| Home | 4 | +5.1 | −0.13 | +2.60 | +17.9 | +0.51 | +3.75 |
| Road | 3 | +2.8 | +0.61 | +0.38 | +6.3 | +1.13 | +1.13 |
| Season | 7 | +4.1 | +0.19 | +1.65 | +12.9 | +0.78 | +2.63 |
| Scenario | Weight on site games | Utah offense shift | Utah defense shift | BYU offense shift | BYU defense shift | Utah margin | Utah win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model of record | n/a | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.7 | 68% |
| Conservative | n/(n+6) | +0.5 | +1.2 | −0.2 | −1.9 | 14.6 | 74% |
| Central | n/(n+3) | +0.7 | +1.8 | −0.3 | −2.9 | 16.4 | 76% |
| Aggressive | n/(n+1) | +1.0 | +2.5 | −0.4 | −4.3 | 18.9 | 80% |
Method: each unit's home or road average, after taking out the normal home field effect, is blended toward its season average. More games means more weight. Positive shifts help the team. Scenarios are illustrative, not a new model version. The model of record is unchanged.
Ball security and third down, game by game. Net is turnovers forced minus turnovers lost, so green is a good night.
| Date | Opponent | Site | Lost | Forced | Net | Own third downs | Opponent third downs | Points per 100 yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/3 | Idaho | Home | 0 | 2 | +2 | 8 of 12 | 3 of 13 | 10.4 |
| 9/12 | Arkansas | Home | 1 | 1 | +0 | 5 of 9 | 7 of 17 | 9.8 |
| 9/19 | Utah State | Home | 1 | 1 | +0 | 10 of 17 | 4 of 15 | 6.9 |
| 9/26 | Iowa State | Road | 0 | 2 | +2 | 3 of 10 | 3 of 14 | 7.5 |
| 10/10 | Kansas | Home | 2 | 1 | −1 | 7 of 12 | 4 of 13 | 7.5 |
| 10/17 | Colorado | Road | 2 | 2 | +0 | 8 of 17 | 4 of 10 | 6.6 |
| 10/24 | Houston | Home | 2 | 1 | −1 | 5 of 10 | 9 of 17 | 4.9 |
| 10/31 | Cincinnati | Road | 2 | 2 | +0 | 7 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 9.2 |
| Home | 5 games | 6 | 6 | +0 | 35 of 60 (58%) | 27 of 75 (36%) | ||
| Road | 3 games | 4 | 6 | +2 | 18 of 38 (47%) | 10 of 35 (29%) | ||
| Season | 8 games | 10 | 12 | +2 | 53 of 98 (54%) | 37 of 110 (34%) |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Lost | Forced | Net | Own third downs | Opponent third downs | Points per 100 yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/5 | Utah Tech | Home | 0 | 4 | +4 | 9 of 11 | 5 of 13 | 12.1 |
| 9/12 | Arizona | Home | 0 | 1 | +1 | 6 of 11 | 5 of 12 | 7.7 |
| 9/19 | Colorado State | Road | 2 | 1 | −1 | 4 of 9 | 7 of 14 | 7.3 |
| 10/3 | TCU | Road | 0 | 1 | +1 | 8 of 16 | 4 of 13 | 7.9 |
| 10/9 | Iowa State | Home | 1 | 0 | −1 | 4 of 10 | 2 of 13 | 4.7 |
| 10/17 | Notre Dame | Home | 2 | 1 | −1 | 8 of 12 | 8 of 19 | 7.8 |
| 10/24 | UCF | Road | 1 | 0 | −1 | 8 of 17 | 9 of 16 | 8.3 |
| 10/31 | Arizona State | Home | 2 | 1 | −1 | 3 of 13 | 6 of 17 | 9.5 |
| Home | 5 games | 5 | 7 | +2 | 30 of 57 (53%) | 26 of 74 (35%) | ||
| Road | 3 games | 3 | 2 | −1 | 20 of 42 (48%) | 20 of 43 (47%) | ||
| Season | 8 games | 8 | 9 | +1 | 50 of 99 (51%) | 46 of 117 (39%) |
Source: ESPN box scores. Points per 100 yards is points scored divided by total yards. Third down counts come from the game rows (Utah 53 of 98 for the season). Turnover timing by quarter is not in the box score feed and is not shown. Red zone efficiency follows in its own section.
The red zone gap in this game is on defense. Utah's defense has let opponents score on 68% of their trips inside the 20 and reach the end zone on 42%. BYU's defense has let them score on 90% and reach the end zone on 71%. On offense the two teams are close. Against the norms of the teams they played, Utah's defense is still the standout.
| FBS games only | ||
|---|---|---|
| OFFENSE: what each team does when it gets inside the 20 (7 FBS games each) | ||
| Trips per game | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| Scored on a trip (any points) | 87% | 85% |
| Touchdown on a trip | 73% | 74% |
| Points per trip | 5.53 | 5.52 |
| DEFENSE: what each team allows when the opponent gets inside the 20 | ||
| Trips per game | 2.7 | 3.0 |
| Scored on a trip (any points) | 68% | 90% |
| Touchdown on a trip | 42% | 71% |
| Points per trip | 3.74 | 5.57 |
A trip is a drive on which the offense ran a play from inside the opponent's 20. A drive that only ran out the clock is not counted. Points per trip counts 7 for a touchdown and 3 for a field goal. FCS games are left out, as elsewhere. These are SPIN counts built from play by play drive data, not a posted league stat. Opponent norms below use the opponents' other FBS games, 13 to 30 trips each.
For each game we take the opponent's red zone record in its other FBS games (the game against Utah or BYU is left out) and weight it by how many trips this game had. Positive on offense and negative on defense is good. Points are percentage points.
| FBS games | Scored on a trip | Touchdown on a trip | Points per trip | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Opp. norm | Diff | Actual | Opp. norm | Diff | Actual | Opp. norm | Diff | |
| 87% | 85% | +2 | 73% | 62% | +11 | 5.53 | 5.01 | +0.52 | |
| 68% | 82% | -14 | 42% | 62% | -20 | 3.74 | 4.95 | -1.21 | |
| 85% | 85% | +0 | 74% | 61% | +13 | 5.52 | 5.01 | +0.51 | |
| 90% | 87% | +3 | 71% | 67% | +5 | 5.57 | 5.28 | +0.29 | |
| Opponent | Site | Offense trips | Opp. defense norm (scored / TD) | Defense trips allowed | Opp. offense norm (scored / TD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | Home | 6: 6 TD, 0 FG | 88% / 79% | 2: 1 TD, 1 FG | 81% / 52% |
| Utah State | Home | 2: 1 TD, 1 FG | 77% / 54% | 2: 0 TD, 0 FG | 80% / 60% |
| Iowa State | Road | 4: 2 TD, 1 FG | 84% / 74% | 1: 1 TD, 0 FG | 100% / 60% |
| Kansas | Home | 5: 5 TD, 0 FG | 79% / 58% | 5: 2 TD, 1 FG | 84% / 53% |
| Colorado | Road | 6: 3 TD, 2 FG | 88% / 42% | 3: 2 TD, 1 FG | 71% / 59% |
| Houston | Home | 3: 2 TD, 0 FG | 89% / 74% | 3: 1 TD, 1 FG | 83% / 66% |
| Cincinnati | Road | 4: 3 TD, 0 FG | 82% / 54% | 3: 1 TD, 1 FG | 86% / 86% |
| Opponent | Site | Offense trips | Opp. defense norm (scored / TD) | Defense trips allowed | Opp. offense norm (scored / TD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado State | Road | 6: 4 TD, 1 FG | 93% / 79% | 3: 3 TD, 0 FG | 90% / 90% |
| Notre Dame | Home | 4: 4 TD, 0 FG | 86% / 50% | 4: 2 TD, 1 FG | 93% / 73% |
| Arizona | Home | 3: 3 TD, 0 FG | 73% / 47% | 3: 2 TD, 1 FG | 84% / 64% |
| TCU | Road | 2: 2 TD, 0 FG | 71% / 41% | 1: 1 TD, 0 FG | 70% / 45% |
| Iowa State | Home | 5: 2 TD, 1 FG | 89% / 78% | 1: 1 TD, 0 FG | 100% / 60% |
| UCF | Road | 3: 2 TD, 0 FG | 84% / 56% | 6: 4 TD, 1 FG | 86% / 62% |
| Arizona State | Home | 4: 3 TD, 1 FG | 84% / 52% | 3: 2 TD, 1 FG | 83% / 56% |
| Unit | Games | Trips | Scored | Touchdowns | Points per trip |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utah offense at home | 4 | 16 | 15 of 16 (94%) | 14 of 16 (88%) | 6.31 |
| Utah offense, season | 7 | 30 | 26 of 30 (87%) | 22 of 30 (73%) | 5.53 |
| Utah defense at home (allowed) | 4 | 12 | 7 of 12 (58%) | 4 of 12 (33%) | 3.08 |
| Utah defense, season (allowed) | 7 | 19 | 13 of 19 (68%) | 8 of 19 (42%) | 3.74 |
| BYU offense on the road | 3 | 11 | 9 of 11 (82%) | 8 of 11 (73%) | 5.36 |
| BYU offense, season | 7 | 27 | 23 of 27 (85%) | 20 of 27 (74%) | 5.52 |
| BYU defense on the road (allowed) | 3 | 10 | 9 of 10 (90%) | 8 of 10 (80%) | 5.90 |
| BYU defense, season (allowed) | 7 | 21 | 19 of 21 (90%) | 15 of 21 (71%) | 5.57 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Offense trips | Defense: trips allowed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/3 | Idaho (FCS, not in totals) | Home | 8: 6 TD, 1 FG, 1 no score | 1: 1 TD |
| 9/12 | Arkansas | Home | 6: 6 TD | 2: 1 TD, 1 FG |
| 9/19 | Utah State | Home | 2: 1 TD, 1 FG | 2: 2 no score |
| 9/26 | Iowa State | Road | 4: 2 TD, 1 FG, 1 no score | 1: 1 TD |
| 10/10 | Kansas | Home | 5: 5 TD | 5: 2 TD, 1 FG, 2 no score |
| 10/17 | Colorado | Road | 6: 3 TD, 2 FG, 1 no score | 3: 2 TD, 1 FG |
| 10/24 | Houston | Home | 3: 2 TD, 1 no score | 3: 1 TD, 1 FG, 1 no score |
| 10/31 | Cincinnati | Road | 4: 3 TD, 1 no score | 3: 1 TD, 1 FG, 1 no score |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Offense trips | Defense: trips allowed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/5 | Utah Tech (FCS, not in totals) | Home | 6: 6 TD | 2: 1 TD, 1 no score |
| 9/12 | Arizona | Home | 3: 3 TD | 3: 2 TD, 1 FG |
| 9/19 | Colorado State | Road | 6: 4 TD, 1 FG, 1 no score | 3: 3 TD |
| 10/3 | TCU | Road | 2: 2 TD | 1: 1 TD |
| 10/9 | Iowa State | Home | 5: 2 TD, 1 FG, 2 no score | 1: 1 TD |
| 10/17 | Notre Dame | Home | 4: 4 TD | 4: 2 TD, 1 FG, 1 no score |
| 10/24 | UCF | Road | 3: 2 TD, 1 no score | 6: 4 TD, 1 FG, 1 no score |
| 10/31 | Arizona State | Home | 4: 3 TD, 1 FG | 3: 2 TD, 1 FG |
Check: counting every game through Houston, Idaho included, Utah's defense allowed points on 12 of 17 trips (70.6%) and touchdowns on 8 of 17 (47%). That matches the figures the Deseret News reported on Oct. 27.
For each team, the three past opponents whose offense and defense profile looks most like Saturday's opponent. These games are the closest thing to a rehearsal.
| Opponent | Site | Score | Margin | Profile gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston | Home | W 21-13 | +8 | 24.2 |
| Kansas | Home | W 41-24 | +17 | 24.3 |
| Iowa State | Road | W 31-17 | +14 | 41.8 |
Average margin +13.0, record 3-0. 2 home and 1 road.
| Opponent | Site | Score | Margin | Profile gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notre Dame | Home | W 28-24 | +4 | 22.0 |
| Arizona | Home | W 28-17 | +11 | 26.3 |
| UCF | Road | L 31-39 | −8 | 39.0 |
Average margin +2.3, record 2-1. 2 home and 1 road.
Treat this as a sanity check, not a forecast. Three games per team, profile gaps of 22 to 42 (lower means a closer match to Saturday's opponent), and different injuries in several of them. Common opponent: Utah won at Iowa State 31-17 (road). BYU beat Iowa State 24-10 (home). Both margins were 14.
The formal Big 12 availability reports come out this week. Until they do, this is what is reported.
The handful of numbers that decide this game, each one checkable at halftime.
| Game | Utah third downs | Utah points |
|---|---|---|
| Idaho (FCS) | 8 of 12 (67%) | 66 |
| Cincinnati | 7 of 11 (64%) | 49 |
| Utah State | 10 of 17 (59%) | 33 |
| Kansas | 7 of 12 (58%) | 41 |
| Arkansas | 5 of 9 (56%) | 43 |
| Houston | 5 of 10 (50%) | 21 |
| Colorado | 8 of 17 (47%) | 27 |
| Iowa State | 3 of 10 (30%) | 31 |
| Threshold | What the season says | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Convert 55% or more on third down | Utah did it in 5 of 8 games and scored 33 or more every time. BYU's defense allows 35% at home and 47% on the road. | Live |
| Run game at or above its norm | Utah ranks 7th in adjusted rush offense and was above its rush norm in 5 of 7 FBS games. BYU ranks 30th against the run. | Likely |
| Keep BYU off the 50 percent mark on third down | Utah's defense has held opponents to 36% at home (27 of 75) and 29% on the road. | Likely |
| Avoid the Colorado game | Colorado was the only game where Utah's rush and pass defenses both finished under norm. BYU's pass offense ranks 21st. | Live |
| Threshold | What the season says | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Hold Utah under 55% on third down | BYU's defense allowed 50% or fewer in all seven wins. On the road it allowed 47%, and UCF's 56% beat it. | Hard |
| Win the turnover battle | BYU is net negative in each of its last four games. Utah has lost 10 turnovers and forced 12. | Live |
| Rush near its norm | Before the Martin injury BYU's run game averaged +1.23 yards per carry against norm. In the four games after, −0.60. His status is questionable. | Unknown |
| Throw above the Utah pass norm | BYU ranks 21st in adjusted pass offense and 5th in pass defense. Utah ranks 41st in pass defense and 46th against the run, its two softest units. | Likely |
STRANOVA rates every team from every game it has played. Each result is credited by margin with diminishing returns, so a blowout counts for little more than a comfortable win. Home field is credited. Ratings start from conference averages, so a team that has played a weak schedule is not overrated.
Tested on games it had not seen. Walk-forward on 314 FBS vs FBS games in weeks 4 to 9: 67.8% winner accuracy against 58.3% for picking the home team and 64.6% for picking the better record.
Projections are statistical estimates for information and entertainment, not wagering advice. Data: ESPN public game feeds through Nov. 1, 2026 (pulled Nov. 4). Market, schedule and injury context from the sources listed below.
ESPN public game and box score feeds; byucougars.com and KUTV (kickoff); Sports Betting Dime (BetMGM line, Nov. 2); ESPN odds via DraftKings (Nov. 4); Daily Utah Chronicle (Nov. 3); Provo.com (Nov. 3); Deseret News (Oct. 27) for the red zone check; Deseret News (Oct. 6) and SL Tribune (Oct. 5) on LJ Martin; AP via theScore.